Understanding the Role of Human Resource in Supporting Stone Pelters in Kashmir

Understanding the role of human resources in any conflict situation, such as the one in Kashmir, requires a nuanced approach. The question of why human resources seem to support stone pelters in Kashmir over the army is a complex one. It’s important to note that the role of human resources is not to take sides, but to ensure the welfare and rights of all individuals involved. This includes both the stone pelters and the army. Let’s delve deeper into this issue.

The Role of Human Resources

Human resources, in the context of conflict situations, refers to organizations and individuals who work towards ensuring the rights, safety, and welfare of all parties involved. This includes non-governmental organizations, human rights activists, and even international bodies like the United Nations. Their role is not to support one side over the other, but to ensure that human rights are upheld and that any abuses are brought to light.

Understanding the Situation in Kashmir

The situation in Kashmir is a complex one, with a long history of conflict and tension. Stone pelting is a form of protest used by some Kashmiris, particularly the youth, against what they perceive as injustices and abuses by the Indian army. The army, on the other hand, is tasked with maintaining law and order, and often finds itself in conflict with these protestors.

Why It May Seem Like Human Resources Supports Stone Pelters

When human resources organizations highlight the rights and welfare of stone pelters, it’s not because they support stone pelting or are against the army. Rather, it’s because they are advocating for the rights of these individuals to protest and express their grievances without fear of excessive force or abuse. This does not mean they condone violence or illegal activities. Similarly, when these organizations criticize the army, it’s not because they are against the army, but because they are against any abuses or violations of human rights.

Supporting the Army

It’s important to note that human resources also supports the rights and welfare of the army. They advocate for the rights of soldiers to carry out their duties without fear of harm or abuse, and they condemn any violence or attacks against the army. However, as the army is a state institution with significant power and resources, it is often the actions of the army that come under scrutiny.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the role of human resources in the Kashmir conflict, or any conflict, is not to take sides, but to ensure the rights and welfare of all individuals involved. This includes both the stone pelters and the army. It’s a complex and nuanced role, and one that is often misunderstood.